Tags
Death Drive, Homura, Jacque Lacan, Madoka, magical girls, Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica, Mami, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Sayaka, Sigmund Freud, yuri
Mahou Shoujo Madoka completely caught me off guard; it’s been a while since an anime infused my brain with some massive amount of steroid and made every neuron of my central nervous system working. Now that it finally came into its conclusion, I can’t think of anything else how to decipher this series but to psychoanalyze an exceptionally psycho-show using the theories of the most notable psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud. Together with Lacan’s concepts, I argue that Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica rightly befalls into the definition of Death Drive.
“The aim of all life is death…inanimate things existed before living ones” – Freud
Death drive is to find oneself grappling with the difficulties inherent in the topic of repetition. It is the drive to self-destruction and the return to the inorganic and inanimate state. Further, it suggests that every person has an unconscious wish to die and goes beyond the pleasure principle by means of reiteration: “the death drive is only the mask of the symbolic order.”
A central principle of death drive is the Pleasure Principle. Jacque Lacan elaborated this as: the subject intends exclusively at avoiding unpleasure and obtaining pleasure. It functions as a limit to enjoyment; it is a law which commands the subject to ‘enjoy as little as possible’. At the same time, the subject persistently attempts to transgress the prohibitions imposed on his enjoyment, to go ‘beyond the pleasure principle’. However, as a result pleasure turns into pain, since there is only a certain amount of pleasure that the subject can bear. Similarly, it is the drives which permit the subject to transgress the pleasure principle, it follows that every drive is a death drive.
Homura and Pleasure Principle
Trauma in death drive tells us that the subjects often tended to repeat or re-enact disturbing experiences to reminisce a painful situation. As we have witnessed, of all the characters, Homura is the most fully explored for this definition. She has a strong driving factor to search for the timeline where she can save and change Madoka’s fate. In order to do this, countless times she negated time despite the fact that every reiteration she does is giving her some pain and numerous times she wakes from her nightmare in the hospital room. Hence, through such a compulsion to reiterate, Homura attempts to ‘bind’ the trauma, thus allowing her to return to a state of quiescence.
When the ideas and experiences enter the mind and become bound, then we observe what appears to be innate tendency towards organization, increase complexity and development. But in the absence of binding—as in case of trauma—we are brought face to face with a more fundamental and contrary tendency of the mind to repeat old experiences. For instance, the act of negating time and waking up from nightmare symbolically implies Homura as masochist—always in search of painful pleasure.
Freud capitalized on the concept of ‘narcissism’ and realized that the ego is not simply a kill-joy, concerned solely with the suppression of libido, but is itself an erotically-charged figure within the individual’s economy of desire. It is apparent that Homura’s ego is not only the ‘headquarters’ of her libido but is also liable to become—itself—an object of her own desire. For instance, Homura always claims that she’s fine alone and can triumph the Walpurgis Night unaided. She also keeps on saying that there’s no way that Madoka can understand—her feelings. Hence, this narcissistic act has been deeply rooted from Homura’s intensely repressed but yet extremely erotic desire to Madoka, and as a result she was able to transform herself from being lame into a badass heroine.
Madoka and Jouissance
Jacque Lacan coined the term jouissance which means an excessive quantity of excitation which the pleasure principle attempts to prevent. In order to live we have to give up something, and it is this loss which fuels desire for that which we cannot have—unless, we’re ready to lose our life. The irony is that we are fully conscious that death is our end. This then, is the meaning of life.
Framing this idea, one of the significant characteristic of Madoka is her drive signifies jouissance. She chose to take her wish not due to fulfill her satisfaction of need but of her drive to release the unbearable pleasure. Throughout the series, we have seen how Madoka slowly developed the drive to become a Mahou Shoujo and that’s because little by little she sees her friends die. She came into the point where she realized that living safely with her family and normal life is too much of a pleasure due to the deaths that she’s witnessing. Because there’s only so much jouissance she can take, at the end she has no choice but the face her dead-end fate and accept the purpose of her life—to be the most powerful magical girl and witch.
Moreover, when meaning penetrates the realm of life we pass into human existence, and concurrently death unites with life. This is because the language which is the locus from which meaning is determined introduces something into subject, something which we can consider the cause of the subject. The cause of the subject is the signifier; consequently, no subject can be its own cause. So, if the subject (Madoka) is indeed constituted by signifier of the Other (contract with Kyubey), then the subject (Madoka) is alienated from itself (or simply has to let go of her original self that is defined as weak). Hence the Madoka’s wish is death, but is also her desire, the meaning of her life.
Madoka as Goddess of Life and Death (Reaction-formation Theory)
This theory tells us that it is usually assumed that the original, rejected impulse does not vanish, but persists, unconscious, in its original infantile form. Thus, where love is experienced as a reaction formation against hate, we cannot say that love is substituted for hate, because the original aggressive feelings still exist underneath the affectionate exterior that merely masks the hate to hide it from awareness.
As we have witnessed Madoka is characterised as a weakling, indecisive, and burden. Furthermore, she’s the last to wish and her “death” is regarded as the worse of all because she disappeared without proof of existence in the world that she saved. But how come death or being locked in eternity is not as terrifying as it seemed unlike the death of the other Mahou Shoujos deaths? Using Freudian perspective, indeed Madoka’s characteristics are all representations of death, indications of what lies beyond the signifier and the pleasure-principle. But by a reaction-formation, where substitution has taken place: Madoka turns out to be a goddess and her death turns out to be the loveliest and most adored. And, as always, the alternative upholds its relationship to the substituted element—the cruelty behind the “death and destroyer” becomes hidden but still there. Hence, Madoka as goddess is a creator and destroyer, representing both life and death.
Yuriscope: Interpreting Madoka and Homura’s Last Moment
Id is the dark, inaccessible part of our personality. In dreams, universe means oneness, flying signifies exhibitionistic wishes or sexual pleasure, aurora borealis symbolizes uplifting of spirits and feelings of affection and passion, and sea predicts unfulfilled anticipations and represents an inward craving for pleasure. Put them all together in that scene and you’ll get a perfect picture of Death Drive. Metaphorically, you’ll see pleasure (oneness), jouissance (orgasm), and Nirvana (nothingness).
My Stand About Kyubey
Until now, I still can’t understand why some people think that Kyubey is evil. The example of treating human as cattle clearly tells us the terror of humanism. We humans tend to think that we are the centre of the universe. We question right from wrong when things don’t go on our way, and most of all we define morality when in fact we couldn’t even accurately discern the exact boundaries of morality and immorality. Undoubtedly, I find Kyubey enlightening not because I’m against humans, but rather I’m against humanism.
______________________________________________________________
Some Open Ended Questions:
Have you ever wonder about the symbolism behind “magical girls.” Why did Kyubey choose and attach grief and death only to girls? Why is ‘she’ so repeatedly placed at the concurrence between life and death? Or simply in a much broader question, why feminine figure?
If according to Lacan death is the “other” in human existence, then think about the role of woman under the patriarchal society. Think about the function of males in this anime. What does the equation tell us?
“The example of treating human as cattle clearly tells us the terror of humanism. We humans tend to think that we are the centre of the universe. We question right from wrong when things don’t go on our way, and most of all we define morality when in fact we couldn’t even accurately discern the exact boundaries of morality and immorality. Undoubtedly, I find Kyubey enlightening not because I’m against humans, but rather I’m against humanism.”
There is a difference in Kyubey treating Humans like cattle and Humans treating cattle like cattle.
I totally get the point of Kyubey not being evil. The difference arises is individuality. In the series Kyubey is able to communicate with different magi, hence each magi expressing/imprinting their own individuality on him/her.
What strikes us is not Kyubey heartlessly harvesting energy via emotions and killing humans. Rather killing them after developing a close
Its the difference between letting a random person suffer and making your friend/brother go through the same.
I think Kyubey’s action could be criticized on this front rather than acting for the “Greater Good”
Keep up the amazing work ^^
“cattle like cattle.” –From this very phrase you’re already being bias. Man set definition for what cattle will be, if Kyubey assigned Man as a variable for their cattle then there’s no ways it’s different.
“Its the difference between letting a random person suffer and making your friend/brother go through the same.”
The reason why there’s a difference is because again you’re being bias, you may have a set of definitions that holds true for all, and vice versa. But with Kyubey he treats everybody the same regardless of their closeness. And again, this argument goes back to humanism. Why did you think that humans should be treated differently from cattle?
I couldn’t criticize Kyubey. He/she/it is only perceived as evil because he lacks “human” emotion. But for instance if an electric cord shocked you, would consider it evil? Pretty much it’s the same with Kyubey.
‘cattle like cattle’ was used in the context of defining the meaning of the action rather than stating a bias.
What I mean to state is kyubey even being emotionless tricked them into being harvested while promising great rewards in exchange. ( The information shared by Kyubey was always half and always used to his/her benefit.)
His action wouldn’t have been questionable if he just transformed them against their wishes.
The deception is what doesn’t fit the equation.
And it is this what makes him/her feel evil.
The question is not if Men are wrong in treating cattle like cattle. It is if Kyubey’s actions are justified in transforming them after giving only half knowledge.
Cattle is only a man-made definition. They became “cattle” because we normalized them to be “cattle” and assigned value to them, but in actuality we can call them with whatever variable. Kyubey being emotionless is a weak argument, not because humans have emotion doesn’t mean that everyone has to follow.
“The deception is what doesn’t fit the equation.
And it is this what makes him/her feel evil.”
You’re obviously bringing morality into the equation.
“It is if Kyubey’s actions are justified in transforming them after giving only half knowledge.”
This is as if you’re saying that it’s not Madoka and others’ responsibility to seek for the truth or knowledge. I believe that that’s they’re duty for themselves, since they are the doers of their choices. I think Kyubey is just fair, they ask him, he answers. Kyubey is just in the mere equilibrium, he’s not evil nor good. It’s out of his responsibility to illuminate others.
What I think is, to give a judgement on kyubey on being evil/good/neutral is something that just can’t be done.
His actions influences both the circles of good and evil, while Kyubey perches itself on this delicate boundary. It is impossible for us to discern what Kyubey is. Be it objections on ground of morality or just his actions. I think we really can’t put kyubey in one of the circles. His actions cannot be justified clearly as black and white. In this reason lets agree to disagree d^_^b
“What I think is, to give a judgement on kyubey on being evil/good/neutral is something that just can’t be done.”
You have a point. But knowing that you’ve an info about Kyubey, why would you stop making a judgment? It only takes one proof to disproof one side. That’s why when I said he’s neutral, that’s because I can’t see any counter-proofs for that.
“His actions cannot be justified clearly as black and white.”
Indeed, he’s neither of the two, that’s why he’s neutral. ^^
Again, inclusion of morality influences our discernment. I’m sorry but I can’t agree with you. :)
Hence we agree to disagree :)
Haha, that’s a good one ^^
This anime it’s mind boggling, kind remember me EVA, awesome!
Agreed. Both are psychological, hence I truly enjoy them.
I’m not going to say that I caught on to all of the deep psychological subtleties in the show, but one thing I am sure of is that they all came together into a mindbogglingly epic package. It’s been a really long while since a show kept me on the edge of my seat like that for its entire duration. Truly a classic. A legend.
Whenever I get so caught up into something, I just can’t help but to relate it to what know. Madoka, as one of them, covered so many aspects that made me thought so deep. Indeed, it’s such an epic package and truly a classic.
I have nothing much to add on the psychoanalysis bit since it’s all good and I have nothing worthwhile to add on, but Kyubey was evil because true – humanism is to an extent, flawed -but isn’t it because of some of these flaws that we inherently find him to be evil?
We can’t define the fine line between morality and immorality, true, but we do have this underlying, subconscious sense as to whether something is right or wrong. Kyubey was evil because he treated life as a statistic , as a commodity. He already stated that the ultimate aim was to let them fall into despair and then become witches to get killed for energy. Hence the reason why all the wishes never end well – he even told this to Homura, about how the more impossible the wish the worse the outcome. As we can see, he has an entire system built to trick girls into killing themselves – much like a cattle farm built to mass-produce beef patties.
However, another question arises: What is evil anyway? If Kyubey is working for the good of the universe (a rather noble task if you ask me) shouldn’t he theoretically be the ‘good guy’ , with Homura only interfering in his grand plans to literally save the universe or something? I think he isn’t evil in nature per se, but his methods surely are.
Kyubey only seemed evil because he’s treating humans as commodities. But if you’re going to modify the scenario and treat Kyubey as a human, and humans as cattle (that means you need to treat yourself as Kyubey as well), will you still say that Kyubey is evil?– I won’t, neither I’ll say that Kyubey is good. In fact, this is exactly the point that I’m trying to raise when I said that I’m against humanism. When humans are the ones being aggravated, suddenly we start to claim that the other side is evil. Humans are so used to be on the top of the food chain and think that everything revolves around us, wherein reality every single organism are just nothing but variables. And I guess, that’s what Kyubey tries to argue all this time to Madoka.
“As we can see, he has an entire system built to trick girls into killing themselves – much like a cattle farm built to mass-produce beef patties.”
I don’t think Kyubey tricks girls; however the ways how Kyubey presents the wish is not good, but not necessarily evil too hence Kyubey is amoral. Also, once Kyubey grants a wish, pretty much that ferret allows the wish taker to be above and beyond “his/her” control. Hence, it’s up to the girls how clever they’re going to face the problem and use they’re wish.
“What is evil anyway?”
I believe the meaning varies from person to person. If you’re going to ask me, again, Kyubey is neither good nor evil. As for his task, I don’t find it noble because I don’t believe he’s doing it intentionally for greater good, but rather he’s defined to do it–that’s his purpose in life.
Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts though. ^^
Ooh, very well researched and well written essay! Loved it!
Anyway, great point on Kyubey. I’ve always maintained that Kyubey is not evil, but amoral. There’s a thin but important difference between amorality and immorality.
Jouissance is a really interesting idea, and I think Sayaka is also a great example of it. Before her wish, she “possesses” the sole attention and dependence of that guy. An excessive pleasure for her perhaps. So much so that it drives her to wish for an end to this, despite knowing the danger/ death that would come with becoming a magical girl. And indeed, this sacrifice eventually comes to define her meaning.
Oh yes, amorality and immorality are two different things. I understand what you mean. I just happened to use “immoral” and “moral” because I want to show the two extreme ends in order to point up my dismay with humanism.
Indeed, that’s a good point Sayaka embodies the idea of jouissance.
I’m glad you like the post, yeah I did some research plus I happened to know aa little bit about death drive because I took a Philosophy course that touches Freud. Anyways, thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts. ^^
Very interesting read.
On the last 2 points:
Without questioning the statement about the greater evil of humanism, I don’t mind the opinion of Kyubey as evil. He is an agent (willful) of suffering. What would be inauthentic or more evil perhaps is for humans to pretend that we are innocent victims here. The magic girls participate in the evil, whether as aggressive in collecting grief seeds or as martyrs. That makes them evil too. Kyubey having responsibility for this (in whatever degree) makes him so.
I suppose the muddling of the conversation of evil has to do with evil motives. Obviously, Kyubey’s motives is to preserve the whole of the universe. This is not an evil intention.
Why magic girls? It’s because the audience that does most of the Blu-ray and merchandise purchasing is male. There is a sexual attraction involved in the dynamic, and this show takes advantage of it.
I thought it was because tween girls have the most violent emotions? ;P
@ghostlightning The reason why I don’t regard Kyubey as evil nor good is because I can see that he’s treating everyone as a mere variable including his self. I understand where you’re coming from, of course if one participates in evil doings then it’s only logical to judge that that person is also evil, pretty much just like the Robin Hood dilemma. And of course, how we discern things are rooted from different perspectives and influences. Hence I believe, bottom line is Kyubey’s is paradoxical in nature.
Actually the question why female in figure is based from the query that Freud used to psychoanalyze the tale of the Three Caskets. But I agree with you, magical girls are being commodified to take advantage of a much wider audience composed of mostly males. It’s just sarcastic though because the guys in this series are helpless and/or losers.
It’s nice to hear that you find this post interesting. Thanks for reading. ^^
@lolikitsune Sorry, but I strongly disagree.
I was trying to be funny ;(
But this is interesting:
Huh… are they? Kamijo is helpless, but he’s hardly a loser. The father is feminized, but why helpless or a loser? If we take the role-swap a step further we can see that the mother, as bread-winner, is also trying to ‘win’ and ‘keep’ the stay-at-home father. Which is really the same thing we see happening with Kamijo. The men aren’t empowered, but the girls are slaving away for them.
… were there even any other guys? Madoka’s brother is hardly a testament to the lameness of dudes.
The only other thing I can think of is the two guys Sayaka kills on the train. That’s a can of worms, though: they’re clearly acting out the absurd extreme of macho misogyny. And then they’re powerless before the wrath of the blossoming female, but she’s just a cog in a global cycle of grief->magic, and her ability to punish them for their indiscretion comes not from her free will or womanhood or anything positive but from the machinations of an alien.
@_@
“I was trying to be funny ;(”
Ohh sorry… at times I can be so overly dense. ;(
I fixed my statement, should have written “and/or.” Also, I meant those words implicitly. But come to think about it, if we are going to analyze the male roles in this series we can see traces of being helpless and losers in them–this being said, I don’t mean to sound sexist, I’m just being honest.
1. Madoka’s dad: financially helpless and emasculated from his supposed role—in Japan you don’t really say salary woman, but salary man. I understand what you mean by stay-at-home-father and I have huge respect for dads who are like that, but of course you can’t deny that in this socially constructed world money is power, and also considering how Japan is a very patriarchal nation.
2. Madoka’s brother: baby symbolizes helplessness, why did they give him a baby role instead of a big brother role? Why baby boy not baby girl?
3. Kyosuke: helpless and loser in a way that Sayaka saw that he’s giving up and to salvage him she chose to become a magical girl.
4. Kyoukou’s dad: he’s emotionally weak; his death isn’t ordinary–he died out of madness and suicide.
5. Lastly , the two guys that you mentioned…
“…magic, and her ability to punish them for their indiscretion comes not from her free will or womanhood or anything positive but from the machinations of an alien.”
Agreed on this. ^^
According to Hume: “’tis not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my little finger” (1739 – 1740/1969, p.461).
It is not contrary to reason to [trick young girls into a bad proposition] unless it is also contrary to sentiment.
An interesting read on morality:
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, Jonathan
Psychological Review, Vol 108(4), Oct 2001, 814-834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
“It is not contrary to reason to [trick young girls into a bad proposition] unless it is also contrary to sentiment.”
Hmm… but the thing is the subject has no emotion, hence there exists no sentiment.
Thanks for recommending Hume.
That was a paraphrased version of a sentence in the reading referenced below it. I believe the author of the original quip meant that it is not contrary to reason in the first place, and in addition, it is also not contrary to us, as healthy, emotional humans, unless it is also contrary to sentiment.
So Kyubey, not being human, and not having such emotions as guilt, shame, disgust, remorse, etc, does not have a problem with what he is doing because he does not feel sentiment, as you said.
Your post was quite interesting for me. I haven’t read much of Freud – have any recommendations?
Actually my knowledge about Freud stemmed out from different philosophers such as Foucault and Bordo. As for my Madoka post, it is inspired by Freud’s Pyschoanalysis of The Three Caskets
Here’s a good read: After Oedipus: Shakespeare in psychoanalysis By Julia Reinhard Lupton, Kenneth Reinhard 190-229
And as for my anti-humanism ideology, I’m very much influenced by Deleuze and Foucault.
Here’s a good read: Gilles Deleuze: Vitalism and Multiplicity By John Marks 19-51
Thanks and nice to hear that you find my post interesting. I skimmed around your blog, I think it’s really interesting too. I think I’ll be visiting your site often ^^.
My exposure to those authors have mostly been from the introduction anthropology class I took a while back, surprisingly. I’ll definitely look into those suggestions.
I don’t update my site very regularly, but I hope that you like whatever you find on there. :)
Anthropology, that’s an interesting field. Two of my roommates were taking Anthropology and since I took some Philosophy courses, I was able to relate to their lectures. It’s cool that the foundaton of Anthropology is also philosophy. :)
Yeah, there’s a surprising amount of philosophy in anthropology. I was not expecting to be reading about philosophers in an intro course about cultures.
Pingback: Journal 1: I Survived the 30-Day Blog Trial | SnippetTee's Blog
To put it as short as possible and because I’m tired of discussing the greatness that is Madoka, this show is the Inception of anime. Not since Revolutionary Girl Utena the Movie has a person’s brain needed to be turned on all the way to Dr. Eggman level of IQ in order to comprehend the vast amount of symbolism, imagery, Faustian elements and beauty behind analyzing both the pros and cons of becoming a superhero.
Cheap off note plug: MadoMura and SayOko FOREVER!
To be honest, I haven’t seen Revolutionary Girl Utena. I know it’s one of the Yuri greats that’s why I really have to pick it up. Unfortunately, I was too busy before because of school, that’s why I missed all these great anime. But, I’m going to make room for them sometime in the future.
I only saw the movie to be honest (Have to watch it again so I can review it) so I’m in the same boat as you are when it comes to the anime itself. Good luck watching the other shows and GO NADAL!
Good for you, at least you’ve seen the movie. In my case, I haven’t seen both the movie and the series. :(
Too bad Nadal lost, but I’m not really too big of a Nadal supporter, but instead a Federer fan. ^^
“I think Kyubey is just fair, they ask him, he answers. Kyubey is just in the mere equilibrium, he’s not evil nor good. It’s out of his responsibility to illuminate others.”
I couldn’t agree more! You are offered a contract? Read first all the details. You are offered a miracle? Watch out because ‘a miracle stands upon the sacrifice of others’ as Ruka says in Revolutionary Utena (You must watch this!). And I actually never understood the excessive reaction Kyubey got when it informed the girls about their souls… It had logic, at least for me…
About the feminine between life and death, my guess would be 1.females are considered more intuitive, because they are sensitive, 2. females are associated with supernatural, e.g. demons etc, because they have a demonic self in them as seen by males in a patriarchy, that are afraid to lose control and power (?)
Great post, although after some point, I kinda lost you =.=’ I must read Philosophy/ Psycology and especially Freud and Lacan. We did a little in university, but not that much and I find them difficult to understand- my head starts spinning… You seem though to have fully taken a grasp of them. Keep blogging :)
I believe your explanation is valid because we all have our own interpretation. But my interpretation is death is radically the other in human existence. And in western culture Woman is semanticized as “the Other” because she represents good, pure, chaotic and seductive (whore/saint binary). In Lacanian thinking during the intercourse woman is assuming the function of representing death and castration—something that the man tries to triumph. She is constructed as the place of mystery, as the site of silence but also of the horrifying void that ‘castrates’ the living man’s sense of wholeness and stability. So I relate this to Madoka, simply because these magical girls were the ones who destroyed and rebuilt the world as men suffered and waited for the new order (although both equally suffered).
I’m not also that knowledgeable when it comes to Philosophy or Psychology, I just happened to take a few Philosophy courses. My room mates were majoring in Philosophy and Anthropology, and I read some of their books if I have nothing to do, that’s why I got to know these for a bit.
Again, thanks for sharing your thoughts and reading this old post. ^^
I went on a spree (commenting)!!! My pleasure exchanging ideas!
P.S.: Why, oh, why are we, women, so ‘evil’? Or better we appear or sound to be? It’s pretty unfair and scary… I guess Lacan wasn’t less ‘sexist’ than Freud was.
From my limited knowledge, although Lacan’s ideas are mostly phallocentric, most feminists used his ideas than Freud.
It’s also my pleasure conversing with you. ^^
Pingback: 2nd Day of Anime: Signing a Contract Kyubey « Lemmas and Submodalities
Pingback: Mahou Shoujo Madoka★Magica – 2011 Best of the Best « Lemmas and Submodalities
Pingback: The Anime Blogger Interrogation Game « Lemmas and Submodalities
I’ve thought a lot about Madoka vis a vis psychoanalysis too, I like what you’ve written, but I think there are some things you missed:
Objet petit a – In Lacanian theory, objet petit a is “the object within the thing which is more like the thing than the thing itself”, it is the object of desire from which we feel we are forever severed, and the cause of desire. It amazed me how literally the show portrays this: the grief seeds are physical ersatz of objet petit a. The role of Kyubey is that of the facilitator of the libidinal economy. He is the “big other” of the mirror stage who symbolically castrates the girls from their own cause of desire, shattering them in two. The girls go mad and turn into witches because their wishes (their drives) were inauthentic. Satako pathologically pretended to care about the violinist boy and healed him with her wish, but he simply abandons her and she realizes that what she really desired was for herself to be desired by him, and that her desire will never come true. She then regresses into a circular drive, closing herself off into a psychotic hellscape from which she cannot escape and can only ruminate on her own despair and lost object. It’s all textbook Freud and Lacan to the point where I’m pretty sure that the show was intended to be read exactly in this way. The show’s weakness is maybe that it tries to be TOO literal about this.
You talk about Madoka having “drive”, but this is a somewhat unfortunate way to formulate it; the point of Madoka is precisely that she overcomes the orbital drive characteristic of the other girls, and fully realizes her desire, which entails a fundamental reform of the libidinal economy and the role of Kyubey. Rather than chasing some impossible wish, she demands a change in the terms of desire as such. She has been “taught how to desire” in Zizek’s words.
I’ll write an article of my own about this at some point.
About Kyubey… I am firmly on the “he is evil” side of the issue for two reasons. First, he preys on the girls by tricking them into forming a contract, which he knows will harm them. Sure, he has no emotions, and so he cannot comprehend HOW it hurts them, but he can clearly see that it does, and he hides the details from them in order to get them to accept his deal. If they refuse, he harms or kills their friends to pressure them into a contract. If he truly thought he was dealing fairly with them, he would not need to hide the details of the deal or pressure the girls into a contract. Second, his contract only has two possible outcomes: They will die in battle, or they will turn into witches and he will eat (his word) their soul (grief seed). He is a soul eating monster.
Pingback: An existentialist reading of Rebellion: Homura as Zarathustra – Anime PPE